'A Christmas Carol' has been described as the most perfect of Dickens's works and as a quintessential heart-warming story, and it is certainly the most popular.
Claire Tomalin
I know it sounds pathetic, but I don't know who I am.
I think it's quite normal for people to have love affairs.
Dickens was a part of how the whole celebration of Christmas as we know it today emerged during the 19th century.
I had forgotten until I looked up old notes that I sold the film rights of my first book, a life of Mary Wollstonecraft: there was a lunch, a contract, a small sum of money, then nothing.
The young Dickens was so alive, so self-confident, so funny.
I enjoyed the whole process of learning and was always happy when autumn came and school or college started up again.
I fell in love with Shakespeare when I was 12, and I read the whole works. Yes, I was precocious.
When I wrote about Mary Wollstonecraft, I found that here she was, in the late 18th century, going to work for the 'Analytical Review.' What was the 'Analytical Review?' It was a magazine that dealt with politics and literature.
'Philomena' was even better than I had expected. I was so pleased to see the evil Irish nuns thoroughly exposed, and I thought Judi Dench gave a flawless performance, as did everybody else.
I always try to travel light.
Simon Russell Beale is an incomparable speaker of Shakespeare and a superb all-round actor.
Everyone finds their own version of Charles Dickens. The child-victim, the irrepressibly ambitious young man, the reporter, the demonic worker, the tireless walker. The radical, the protector of orphans, helper of the needy, man of good works, the republican. The hater and the lover of America. The giver of parties, the magician, the traveler.
I have been left-wing always, from childhood.
I have been fascinated by Dickens worshippers who strenuously deny that he did anything wrong in relation to his wife, even though the record is clear that he did.
Biographies are, in their nature, far more difficult to make into films than novels, because novels come with plots constructed and dialogue written, whereas I don't invent dialogue for my subjects or plot their lives for them.
Throughout his life, Dickens cared passionately about orphans.
Why do we read biography? Why do we choose to write it? Because we are human beings, programmed to be curious about other human beings, and to experience something of their lives. This has always been so - look at the Bible, crammed with biographies, very popular reading.
All writers behave badly. All people behave badly.
The thing I love about Rome is that is has so many layers. In it, you can follow anything that interests you: town planning, architecture, churches or culture. It's a city rich in antiquity and early Christian treasures, and just endlessly fascinating. There's nowhere else like it.
Dickens is a lover of human beings; a relisher of human beings.
As a young man, Dickens worked as a reporter in the House of Commons and hated it. He felt that all politicians spoke with the same voice.
You become more tolerant when you become older. You're not interested in rapping people over the knuckles; you're interested in understanding them.
Dickens was very practical and sensible.
Historians will handle a much wider range of sources than a biographer and will be covering a broader spectrum of events, time, peoples.
Biographers use historians more than historians use biographers, although there can be two-way traffic - e.g., the ever-growing production of biographies of women is helping to change the general picture of the past presented by historians.
All the people I have written about remain with me - perhaps they are my closest friends.
Poetry was one of the things that interested me most as I was growing up. I used to write it in my head all the time. I still think the very greatest pleasure in life is to write a poem.
People who attack biography choose as their models vulgar and offensive biography. You could equally attack novels or poems by choosing bad poems or novels.
I continually get more information about a subject after the book has been published.
I think it's about as likely Jane Austen was gay as that she was found out to be a man.
Writing Charles Dickens' biography is like writing five biographies.
I always feel sad when I come to the end of a book.
The book doesn't end when you finish writing it.
I sometimes think that, since I started writing biographies, I've had more of a life in books than I have had in my real life.
After Shakespeare, Dickens is the great creator of characters, multiple characters.
Writers often feel obliged to adopt some sort of public appearance.
In 1843, everybody was hungry, unemployed, and conditions were very bad.
Dickens had more energy than anyone in the world, and he expected his sons to be like him, and they couldn't be.
Dickens belongs to the English people.
The whole world knows Dickens, his London and his characters.
As he approached his 28th birthday in February 1840, Dickens knew himself to be famous, successful and tired. He needed a rest, and he made up his mind to keep the year free of the pressure of producing monthly installments of yet another long novel.
By the time I went up to Cambridge, I was extremely quiet and well behaved, although I now meet people who remember me as not like that at all.
One of my most vivid memories of the mid-1950s is of crying into a washbasin full of soapy grey baby clothes - there were no washing machines - while my handsome and adored husband was off playing football in the park on Sunday morning with all the delightful young men who had been friends to both of us at Cambridge three years earlier.
Writers don't make good spouses. When I am writing, I'm not a good wife. I shut myself away, and all my emotions are directed towards what I'm trying to write.
I would like to have a more social life than I have.
I've behaved badly in my life. I hope I haven't behaved as badly as Dickens! In a way, if you're a woman, you're not in a position to behave as badly, because you don't have the economic power.
I would perhaps like to go back to writing small books about obscure people.
I was very priggish as a child. I saved up for a book on medieval English nunneries, for which I was despised by my friends.
I didn't start writing my own books until I was 40.
